January 16th, 2021

Pipeline supporters need to step up

By Lethbridge Herald Opinon on March 4, 2020.

First Nations who want GasLink must help to ensure pipeline is built

Gwyn Morgan


In 2015, we gathered in the meeting house of the remote Tl’azt’en First Nation at Tache, 215 kilometres northwest of Prince George, B.C.

I was there as volunteer chair of the B.C. Industry Training Authority (ITA), the organization responsible for funding and facilitating trades training in the province.

Accompanying me were the ITA CEO and other board members who shared a passion for our dual mission of helping young people gain rewarding careers in the trades, while providing the skills needed to carry out virtually every public and private project in the province.

One of those board members was LNG Canada CEO Andy Calitz, a South African engineer who had led liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects around the world. It was his leadership and determination that would make the largest industrial project in Canadian history a reality.

The natural gas for this project would be transported from landlocked northeast B.C. gas fields through the Coastal GasLink pipeline, creating opportunities to learn a trade for the Tl’azt’en and other First Nations members along its route.

But we faced a dilemma. Many young people from those remote villages lacked the academic qualifications normally required to enter trades training. After wrestling with that dilemma, the ITA board decided to create an entirely new certified trade called Construction Craft Worker. Trainees would receive the knowledge needed to work safely as labourers as they learned the skills needed for more advanced trades.

At the invitation of the Tl’azt’en chief and councillors, we came to discuss our Construction Craft Worker initiative. The chief offered a traditional welcome and I respectfully responded, describing our mission. Then came a memorable feast of bear, beaver, deer, elk and moose, along with fish from the nearby lake.

It turned out to be an emotional day for all. The chief was near tears as he told us that, while they hear many leaders’ statements from afar aimed at First Nations, we were the first group of leaders to honour his people by travelling to their village. That meant more to the chief and council than we could have imagined. The many young band members in attendance expressed their hope that working on the pipeline might help them gain the trade qualifications needed to gain employment afterwards.

Given their remote location, our board knew the Coastal GasLink pipeline would be their only chance in a generation to achieve that.

The arduous process of gaining approval for the LNG project took much longer than expected but finally, five years after our meeting, the gas supply pipeline is under construction. And 20 First Nations along the route have signed agreements that not only offer employment opportunities, but also financial benefits that will help lift their communities out of poverty.

Who could have imagined that this long-awaited dream would turn into a national nightmare due to opposition by unelected “hereditary” Wet’suwet’en band chiefs of just one of those 20 First Nations? And that this single intra-First Nation jurisdictional dispute could spawn illegal blockades disrupting railways, roads and international commerce across our entire nation?

I’m sure most Canadians were as dismayed as I was to see ministers of the Crown meekly asking for permission to enter an unlawfully occupied site to “dialogue” with a disparate agglomeration of protesters opposed to virtually everything that we value about our country.

There have been many times over the years when I’ve witnessed people who keep trying to change the behaviour of an impossibly intransigent opponent, rather than going around them to engage supporters. In this case, the way to do that is breathtakingly obvious.

There are 20 First Nations who, just like the Tl’azt’en, are counting on the Coastal GasLink to help lift them out of poverty and provide opportunities for their young people gain employable skills. If I was prime minister, my cabinet ministers would be on their way immediately to each of those 20 First Nations to solicit their help in making sure the pipeline gets built.

My experience in that Tl’azt’en meeting house shows that ministers from our national government coming to meet First Nations on their own ground would be profoundly impactful in encouraging First Nations leaders who actually care about the future of their people to speak out against those who do not.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired Canadian business leader who has been a director of five global corporations. Distributed by Troy Media.

Share this story:

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

A disputed environmental claim publicized by the fossil fuel firms backing a $40-billion liquefied natural gas project in B.C. can be traced back to a lifelong industry insider, who cautioned in interviews that his underlying calculations are “theoretical.”

Meyer, Carl. “Disputed environmental claim championed by Tories comes from Shell insider.” National Observer, 4 March 2020, https://www.nationalobserver.com/2020/03/04/news/disputed-environmental-claim-championed-tories-comes-shell-insider? Accessed 4 March 2020.


what seems to support pipelines through indigenous lands are the few that get to pocket the money, purportedly representing the peoples. as history most often tends to underscore, a few get rich while the many get robbed.


TC Energy is an owner of CGL. TC has 925 million shares outstanding. It is a widely owned stock in Canada and abroad. Widows, grandmothers, pension plans (CPP – therefore you), endowments, institutions and many others own the shares. If TC profits from the CGL pipeline so will its shareholders (meaning you, unless you haven’t worked an thus do not contribute to CPP). So this must be the “few” who will get rich from a much needed project.


Additionally, Mr. Morgan takes great umbrage in his use of the pronoun “we” in a failed attempt to defend his position. His thinly veiled racist statement utilising loaded emotional words does not go unnoticed and only serves to rally the uninformed and/or misinformed!

“I’m sure most Canadians were as dismayed as I was to see ministers of the Crown meekly asking for permission to enter an unlawfully occupied site to “dialogue” with a disparate agglomeration of protesters opposed to virtually everything that we value about our country.”

Moreover, Mr. Morgan demonstrates a significant level of ignorance vis a vis the impact of the Indian Act on First Nations governance models.

But then, given Mr. Morgan sits as a director on the board of EnCana, is a member of the board of trustees of the Fraser Institute, holds a position of director of the Manning Institute and is a non-executive director of the HSBC Bank in Canada, in addition to being a board member of several other large Canadian corporations, would the reader expect anything more than a bellowing out of the free market fundamentalism mantra?


another exceptional entry, imo. the “virtually everything we value about our country” statement is gross and unnerving; many, and hopefully, most, canadians value decency over might and money. as for your info that morgan is associated with hsbc (and big oil), it surely underscores his character. i recall the hsbc being a big time money launderer for the world’s most crooked and criminal, and yet they got a slap on the wrist for that. whatever happened to seizing all assets under the proceeds from crime laws…guess they do not apply to financial orgs.