Galt Gardens fencing concept sparks strong public opinions
By Lethbridge Herald on July 21, 2023.
Herald photo by AL BEEBER
An entrance to Galt Gardens is seen on Thursday. City council on Tuesday will address an official business motion calling for administration to look into the feasibility of a wrought iron fence being installed around the downtown park.Steffanie Costigan
LOCAL JOURNALISM INITIATIVE REPORTER
With city council to consider on Tuesday an official business motion for administration to look into the feasibility of wrought iron fencing being installed around Galt Gardens, many opinions have been formulated and are being expressed by community members.
The OBM to be moved by Mayor Blaine Hyggen and co-sponsored by Deputy Mayor John Middleton-Hope states, “The protection of public spaces is important to ensure the vibrancy of a city by creating an environment that could include using enhanced security measures and fencing around Galt Gardens that is both aesthetically attractive and provides enhanced safety for citizens.”
The motion specifically calls on council to “direct Administration to examine the cost, availability, implementation, and any other considerations of erecting a wrought iron fence for Galt Gardens as a permanent park boundary and report back to the Economic Standing Policy Committee by November 15, 2023 for council’s consideration,”
Owner of Analog Books, Scott Warris, shared his thoughts on the fencing proposal and is uncertain of the thinking behind the proposal.
“That’s certainly not solving any kind of issues that we’re dealing with here. I’m not exactly sure what the thinking is behind it.
“But I really can’t say too much because I haven’t even heard exactly what the whole proposal was. But it sounds to me like it was something that was just an idea that was thrown out there. And I’m sure it won’t go anywhere.,” said Warris.
A City representative noted if the motion passes information would first be gathered and then come back to a Standing Policy Committee, at which time the community would have the opportunity to provide input.
The City added the proposal is not something which necessarility will move forward in the future, but is an option for the City to explore.
Walker Glover, a foreman with the Clean Sweep program, said in his personal experience he believes the fence would not be much help.
“I think just with my experiences and seeing how fences have worked in other properties that they still have openings – people will still be able to get in unless they had guards, but they’re not going to have guards kicking people out. So it’s kind of just going to be a waste of money in my opinion, but who knows?” said Glover.
In 1909 a family donated the land of the Galt Garden to the City in perpetuity.
Angela Sturm, a resident living downtown, expressed her concerns with the idea of the proposed fence and the divided environment it creates.
“Really let’s think about Lethbridge and the city and the infrastructure. How good is the fence gonna be, you know what I mean?… It’s just too much, and like, help our Indigenous population, help our homeless population, don’t just $%$%ing shun them. That just creates more divide and more tension. And it creates an us versus them sort of environment.”
Local women experiencing homelessness who wish to remain anonymous voiced their concerns with the proposed fence and the division it will create.
“They are separating us from each other, from white people. So they can all have fun and then have us on the outside. You know who owned this land first? The Indigenous people so don’t bother building a fence.
“This is where people go to have peace. But no matter what they’re going to do it anyways, why does our opinion even matter?”
18-17
Thankyou Lethbridge Herald reporter Steffanie Costigan fir this important article. I am so impressed that you included the voices of the women who would be most impacted by this proposed fence. The whole idea is so repugnant. a motion being put forward by Mayor Blaine Hyggen and Councilor John Middleton-Hope. The motion calls on city administration to investigate the possibility of fencing the perimeter of Galt Gardens. The fact that the land of Galt Gardens was traditionally a gathering place for Indigenous people makes this proposed fence, which will promote further barriers and exclusion, a disgrace.
This is what happens when everything planned for supporting Drug Addicts is done under the “Maxwell Smart Cone of Silence”! This council is planning something for all of us(you aren’t going to like it, I promise). It includes the Shelter, the Old Eldorado Building, the Lealta Building and Kitchen Center. It also includes the empty property across the street from the Bakery and probably everything inbetween, when completed.
That “something” is a Community Care Center (CCC) that is not “really just for our community!
So my belief, at the moment, is that the intent is to give away all this area (described above) to those intent on destroying the downtown businesses, employers and residents.(not the true homeless, the addicts who need to steal to feed their habit)
Compensation will be City and Council will try and reclaim property including Galt Gardens as if “nothing happening here folks, we’re all good”, just don’t look north of the Stafford bridge, please!(KAOS headquarters)
That may be a reasonable trade off, in their assessment, for complacent Lethbridge, maybe it is? Since Thaddeus and Maxwell Smart (Council) won’t lift the “Cone of Silence”, people surmise this is just another bonehead move. Like the new playground in the Galt Gardens?
Perhaps its time to lift the “Cone of Silence”!
Code or Cone? But I agree. The fence is another band aid, very expensive and counter productive. I would feel trapped in. Once you lock out the addicts at night,where will they go? Many will not go to the shelter,they don’t like the rules there. It is harder to access their drug dealers ,as well.
The gardens were fenced once about a 100 years ago. Look at old, old pictures of the galt gardens.