By Delon Shurtz - Lethbridge Herald on May 25, 2024.
LETHBRIDGE HERALDdshurtz@lethbridgeherald.com
A Lethbridge man who had sex with an underage girl while she was passed-out drunk, is serving a sentence in a federal penitentiary.
Morgan Joseph Tetreault was sentenced in April to three and a half years in prison after Justice Kristin Ailsby found him guilty of sexual assault.
Ailsby convicted Tetreault last February, and said that after she repeatedly reviewed the evidence from the trial last year to make sense of what happened on the evening of the assault some years ago, she accepted the girl’s evidence over Tetreault’s, concluding the girl was sexually assaulted.
“On the whole, I found (the complainant) to be a very credible witness,” Ailsby said.
Tetreault, on the other hand, testified with little conviction, Ailsby said. His evidence was inconsistent and he was unclear on what exactly happened. He also admitted to a mutual friend in a text message that he sexually assaulted the girl, then he changed his story.
“He admitted that he made his admission before the police were involved, and it was only after he knew that criminal charges were imminent, that he changed his story to deny the assaults.”
During his trial, Tetreault testified that even though he and the girl wanted to have sex, they never did. However, the girl, who was 17 at the time and cannot be identified under a court-ordered publication ban, testified the assault occurred while she was extremely intoxicated and while she was passed out.
The girl testified she had been drinking most of the day before she invited Tetreault, who was 20 at the time, to her house, where they spent some time on her couch kissing and touching each other. The girl occasionally went into the kitchen to pour herself shots of vodka, and even though Tetreault had one or two shots, he never drank enough to become intoxicated.
While the two were making out on the couch, Tetreault stood up and led the unsteady girl to her bedroom.
“(She) specifically remembered how difficult the short walk was because she was so impaired,” Ailsby said. “She could barely stand, and when she went through the door jamb to her bedroom, she struck her right shoulder hard because she couldn’t maintain her balance.”
Tetreault had to help the girl onto her bed, where he began to have sex with her.
“She then passed out,” Ailsby said. “Her next memory was waking up some time later.”
Ailsby said the girl realized what had happened, became distressed and had a panic attack. Tetreault later admitted to a friend what had happened.
“Mr. Tetreault acknowledged very clearly that he sexually assaulted (the girl) on the night at issue.”
Tetreault admitted at trial that he and the girl were making out on the couch then headed to the bedroom. He testified the girl had not been drinking and was not intoxicated, and suggested she was a willing participant and encouraged him to have sex.
“He explained he was reluctant to do this and told her so,” Ailsby said. “He testified, ‘I told her that we shouldn’t be doing this,’ and that ‘we should be more than this.’ “
She became upset and left the room while he stayed and fell asleep. He was later asked to leave.
Ailsby concluded that the girl was grossly intoxicated at the time while Tetreault remained sober throughout the night. After a period of time in which the two were kissing and touching, Tetreault “chose to move that touching and kissing into the bedroom.” He had to help her walk to the bedroom because she was too drunk to do it on her own, then he removed his clothes and her’s.
“Once in the bedroom, (she) did not ever communicate consent to sexual touching of any kind by way of words or any contact. Mr. Tetreault did not ever ask (her) to have sex at any point during their night together; no steps were ever taken by Mr. Tetreault to confirm (her) degree of sobriety, (her) ability to provide consent, or (her) actual consent.”
Although sentenced to three and a half years in prison, Tetreault was given credit for 63 days spent in pre-trial custody. He was also ordered to register with the Sex Offender Information Registry for 20 years, and submit a sample of his DNA for the National DNA Data Bank.
22
notwithstanding the finding that the sex was not consensual, not understanding why 17 is reported as being underage. it was reported as such when last in the news, as well. it is my understanding 16 is the age of consent for sex?
would the negs at least explain. is 16 not the age to be able to consent to sex? therefore, it is incorrect to write the victim is underage. she is underage insofar as drinking alcohol, but that is not apparently the underage reference. to be clear, i am not taking issue with the court’s decision.
the emotional level of sorry trolls that take the time to hunt down and enter a neg vote just because they do not the like the person…seemingly nothing to do with any level of intelligent discussion.
indeed, 16 is the age of sexual consent, save for some caveats. the article appears to be lacking in accuracy.
https://justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/other-autre/clp/faq.html