US Center for SafeSport fires CEO Ju’Riese Colón, the latest sign of crisis for the Olympic watchdog

By Canadian Press on April 22, 2025.

DENVER (AP) — Ju’Riese Colon has been fired as CEO of the U.S. Center for SafeSport in the latest and most visceral sign of a crisis that began after revelations the center had hired an investigator who would later be charged with rape.

The center told The Associated Press about Colon’s removal Tuesday in an email. It brought an abrupt end to a tenure that began in 2019, when she was hired to help the then-2-year-old center, which was established to combat sex abuse in Olympic sports, bring its operation to full speed.

The center said its board chair, April Holmes, would lead an interim management committee composed of board members while they search for Colon’s replacement.

“We are grateful for Ju’Riese’s leadership and service,” Holmes said in the statement sent to the AP. “As we look ahead, we will continue to focus on the Center’s core mission of changing sport culture to keep athletes safe from abuse.”

Colon did not immediately respond to a text message left by the AP.

In her four-plus years at the Denver-based center, she failed to fully untangle its struggles with long delays in processing an ever-growing caseload, or the stream of complaints from both accusers and accused who had been dragged through a resolution process that could take years.

No issue, however, illustrated the center’s struggles more than its handling of former Pennsylvania vice squad officer Jason Krasley.

Krasley was hired as an investigator for the center in 2021, but was abruptly fired last November when the center learned he had been arrested for allegedly stealing money from a drug bust he was a part of while with the force.

The center made no public mention of that until AP reported about the connection on Dec. 26. Then, two weeks later, Krasley was arrested again, this time for rape, sex trafficking and other crimes — an episode that Colon conceded was “devastating” for the center.

The AP reporting led Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, to open an inquiry into the center’s handling of the Krasley affair.

In a letter to Colon, he wrote: “Accusations of rape and other sex crimes against any SafeSport investigator are especially concerning given SafeSport’s mandate to protect athletes from similar abuse.”

It was an obvious conclusion made more jarring by the fact he had to write it at all.

Colon’s response to Grassley last month brought up more questions, including why the center hired Krasley despite knowing he was the subject of an internal investigation. Grassley sent another list of questions to Colon, answers for which were requested by May 1.

Meanwhile, the center reached out to people whose cases Krasley handled, offering them counseling and a chance to share questions and concerns about the interaction with the investigator. That move triggered another set of problems.

One such person, Jacqui Stevenson, told AP the notification retraumatized her and made her wonder if her case, which resulted in her abuser receiving a one-year probation, could end in his penalty being voided.

The entire episode brings into question the viability of this 8-year-old experiment borne out of the U.S. Olympic movement’s inability to deal with wide-ranging abuse crises at USA Swimming, USA Taekwondo and, most notably, USA Gymnastics involving now-imprisoned doctor Larry Nassar.

Fueled by Congressional hearings that included heart-wrenching testimony from abuse survivors, a consensus grew that an independent entity was needed to do the work the U.S. Olympic committee and its sports subsidiaries could not.

Congress passed laws requiring most of SafeSport’s money to come from the organizations it oversaw. Despite its funding source, the center insisted on independence. It placed big demands on the sports organizations — requiring resource-consuming annual audits and claiming first right of refusal on cases involving their sports.

It led to a lack of trust but also a fear of speaking up at both the Olympic committee and inside the individual sports agencies, lest anyone be accused of undermining the center, even if it wasn’t performing well.

Others, though, did speak up.

Among the most common complaints the AP fielded from dozens of accusers, accused, witnesses and attorneys who reached out over the past 24 months was that everything the center did took too long and left too many people in limbo.

This was a symptom bedeviling an organization that, at last count, was receiving more than 150 new reports a week but had fewer than three dozen full-time investigators to sort through them.

___

AP sports: https://apnews.com/hub/sports

Eddie Pells, The Associated Press