October 16th, 2021

Piikani at odds over coal mining, says society chair

By Tim Kalinowski on May 18, 2021.

LETHBRIDGE HERALDtkalinowski@lethbridgeherald.com

The Mountain Child Valley Society represents the true opinion of the people of Piikani First Nation on the issue of the Grassy Mountain Coalmine, and not the elected leadership which decided to make a deal with mining giant Benga and its Canadian partner Riversdale Resources, says Adam North Peigan, chair of the society.
“What had happened at Piikani First Nation is there was some consultation that was done, but it was on a government to government relationship,” he says. “So they came in and met with our leadership, and there was very little consultation with the grassroots community members. At the end of the day, the grassroots community members were left out in the dark as far as any kind of decision-making that had happened.
“Our leadership, they unequivocally supported the coal exploration of Grassy Mountain; however, a vast majority of (Piikani) members are opposed to it.”
The group has been actively lobbying all levels of government over the past four months in the hopes they will realize that most people on Piikani First Nation are opposed to Grassy Mountain despite the letter of support written by tribal leadership and its endorsement of the project submitted to the Joint Review Panel last year.
“I think our leadership is looking at those carrots being dangled in front of them,” North Peigan states, “such as employment opportunities for the Nation, and annual payments to the Nation over the next 25 years, but the thing is they are not looking on the flipside and the effects this is going to cause for our community now, and moreso in future generations going 50 years down the road.”
North Peigan says before any official endorsement was given to Grassy Mountain, Piikani leadership should have submitted the question to a referendum amongst the people.
“I am quite positive had this gone through a referendum within the Piikani First Nation, then we wouldn’t be having this discussion,” he says. “Because the Grassy Mountain coal mining project would not have been supported by the Piikani First Nation.”
North Peigan said his group has “aggressively lobbied” the federal Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson and his federal cabinet colleagues so that when the Government of Canada receives the final Joint Review Panel report next month any official statement of support from the Piikani First Nation leadership will be excluded from its considerations.
“I hope they hear from Piikani First Nation is we are adamantly opposed to any coal exploration in the province of Alberta; period,” he says. “Because that is how the vast majority of community members in Piikani Nation feel. We do have concerns with environmental (impacting) projects in our ancestral lands, and the Grassy Mountain coal mining project is within our ancestral lands. It is our responsibility to be good stewards.”

Follow @TimKalHerald on Twitter

Share this story:
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Les Elford

Adam; I am so glad you feel this way and have identified your stand. Thank you. Bravo, Well Done! It exhibits more common sense for future generations from more stewards of the land. I wish you well and great success in your endeavors my friend. It is very much similar to the current Astra Veneca COVID -19 vaccine controversy. The benefit of getting the vaccine outweighs the possible consequences of not. Yes economic gain may be obtained from Coal Mining for a select few for a short period (in the grand scheme of things) but at what cost. (more for foreign corporations than for us) and we all know how ethical corporations are; Everyone it seems; has some awareness of the ethics of corporations. Everyone it seems but, the politicians who have jumped into bed with the corporations, and lost control of being able to govern.
Just as some feel like guinea pigs getting a vaccine, Albertans will be subject to being guinea pigs from corporate rule and government mismanagement for what some perceive as economic benefit. I would suggest the “costs” will exceed the benefits (cost to environmental clean up and restoration after mines are depleted (if corporate responsibility is accepted and they do clean up) i.e orphan well debacle. Destruction to natural wildlife habitat, fisheries, cattle industry, agricultural industry and add on business along with Selenium leaching into our fragile water supply. (News article today about how scientists are watching our water supply and – run off as our semi- arid geographical region may find itself in draught conditions this summer). I understand there is not a Coal Mine on the planet that has been able to stop Selenium leaching into water supplies. Even after many millions being spent trying.
TECK Resources in South Eastern BC has tried unsuccessfully for years. Resulting recently in having a $60 Million lawsuit filed against them. Along with the economic costs and social costs of failed businesses due to the damage done from Coal Mining in the Eastern Slopes of the Rockies. I just don’t understand how we destroy our environment, so we can sell coal to China so they can build steel to increase their infrastructure and economy and then we get penalized with increased carbon tax, when the amount of carbon created from Canada is miniscule compared to China and other countries. I admit I am not the smartest guy, but I just have to say …. HUH????? How does this make any sense?
Thank you for your time and attention to this critical matter.
Les Elford