June 22nd, 2024

Trudeau giving Quebec a deal on carbon taxes

By Lethbridge Herald on December 30, 2022.

Franco Terrazzano

All provinces are equal. But one province is a little more equal in the eyes of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Next year, taxpayers in every province will have to pay his government’s mandatory minimum carbon tax rate. Every province but one: Quebec. 

 Quebec started in early on carbon taxes, establishing a cap-and-trade system with California in 2014, when Stephen Harper was prime minister. Then in 2018 the Trudeau government imposed a carbon tax backstop to be paid by any province that hadn’t made its own arrangements to implement a carbon tax. 

 Under it, nine provinces and the three territories are required to raise the carbon tax to 14 cents per litre of gas next year, going to 37 cents per litre by 2030. But the backstop doesn’t apply to Quebec. Though theoretically there’s no limit to the province’s cap-and-trade cost, which is the result of demand and supply, it’s currently nine cents per litre of gas. Next year, by law, it must stay above five cents per litre. But nothing requires it to be higher than that. Meanwhile, everyone else in Canada will be paying 14 cents per litre. 

 In 2030, Quebec’s carbon tax is forecast to reach 23 cents per litre of gas. But everyone else will be paying 37 cents per litre. That means that in 2030, an Ontario family will pay $10 more when they fuel up their minivan because of the carbon tax than drivers in Trudeau’s Montreal riding. Even La Presse notes that Quebec’s tax “is much less than in the federal system.”

The key part of the federal backstop is “ensuring that carbon pricing is in place across Canada at a similar level of stringency.” But if there’s supposed to be a “similar level of stringency,” then why will Quebec’s tax cost be 14 cents per litre less by 2030? Is there some scientific reason to explain Quebec’s lower tax? Or is it because Ottawa’s carbon tax is about politics, not the environment?

 Compare Quebec with Nova Scotia and it’s clear it’s the latter. Nova Scotia currently has a provincial cap-and-trade carbon tax, too. And Nova Scotia has reduced its emissions by 36 per cent since 2005, Quebec only by 12 per cent. But Ottawa isn’t letting Nova Scotia off. Beginning next year, Nova Scotians will have to pay the higher federal tax, too — though Quebec gets to keep its system. 

 Instead of bullying Nova Scotia the prime minister should be asking Nova Scotians for advice. The province’s carbon tax now costs about two cents per litre of gas, by far the lowest rate in Canada. Yet since 2005, Nova Scotia has somehow managed to reduce its emissions more than every other province except New Brunswick. 

 On the other hand, British Columbia had the highest carbon tax in Canada for years yet B.C.’s emissions increased by about eight per cent between 2015 and 2019. Canada’s emissions also increased during the first year of Trudeau’s national carbon tax. 

 The federal government is misleading Canadians about Quebec’s preferential treatment. It’s not the first time the government has misled Canadians about the carbon tax. Before the 2019 election, Trudeau’s then-environment minister said the government had “no intention” of raising the carbon tax beyond 11 cents per litre of gas. But it’s being cranked up to 37 cents per litre by 2030. 

 The Trudeau government also claims “families are going to be better off” with its carbon tax-and-rebate scheme. The Parliamentary Budget Officer shows that’s magic math. In the four provinces the PBO studied, the federal carbon tax will cost the average household between $402 and $847 in 2023, even after the rebates. 

 The last thing Canadians need is Ottawa raising costs and stoking national division. There’s an obvious solution: scrap the federal carbon tax and lower gas prices and heating bills across Canada. 

 Franco Terrazzano is the Federal Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

Share this story:

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


When did the Canadian Taxpayers Federation get promoted from ‘opinion’ to ‘news’?


Alberta would have been exempt from the federal carbon tax had the current government in power not repealed the existing carbon tax in May of 2019.
Moreover, as previously asked in this thread, when did an op-ed become news?

Last edited 1 year ago by IMO
Say What . . .

Nothing new about that! We have known for decades that Quebec is the ‘chosen one’ and the rest of us are slaves, peons or should I say pee-ons!
That is the reason Alberta and Saskatchewan decided to start standing up for their provinces. There is a long list of perks Quebec gets from Canada that the rest us do not.
When Canada is torn apart, who will Quebec enslave to pay for their perks!
When they closed the Aerospace Experimental station in Cold Lake as soon as the Liberals got back in, where did they move it? Quebec! Along with all the jobs. The Air Weapons Range was a perfect place but the prodigal son once again takes it all!
There is not much I like about the new Premier, but one important thing: the Sovereignty Act, which sends a loud and clear message we are tired of being the slaves to Quebec!