Charlie Kirk’s values didn’t represent those of Canadians
By Lethbridge Herald on September 26, 2025.
Editor,
As a Canadian, Rachael Thomas has absolutely no business eulogizing an American fascist influencer like Charlie Kirk in the House of Commons.
On what basis do I use the term fascist? Trust Kirk’s own words, not mine. His list of objectionable, offensive beliefs is lengthy.
He advocated for hatred and violent protest on many occasions, and represented a plethora of terrifying beliefs. He didn’t condemn the deaths of children killed in mass shootings and supported the idea of forcing his own child to carry a pregnancy resulting from rape to term.
There are others, and more; yet his even tone of voice, alleged Christianity, and European ancestry gave him the privilege of appearing balanced and reasonable. He was not “just a conservative who debated people at colleges.” He said things that, in our country, which still has standards of decency, would be considered hate speech.
And yet our representative, who also avows herself a Christian, and tolerant, called for a standing ovation for this man. While no one deserve to be shot in cold blood, Kirk considered gun deaths to be the price of the second amendment right that Americans fetishize so dearly, even at the expense of human rights and their democracy and safety.
Are these the values of Rachael Thomas? If so, how can we possibly trust her to advocate for constituents whose humanity she fundamentally devalues, and agrees with devaluing? I am calling for her immediate resignation from Parliament. A Nazi has already been applauded by accident in Parliament, and applauding the modern equivalent, a rhetorical terrorist, is an international embarrassment.
Michelle Browne
Lethbridge
10-9
The only hate speech I see is the kind that argues valid points with nonsense reasoning, reasoning that Charlie has backed up with examples and quote. All he wanted to do was have a conversation. He’s more than once agreed to disagree, because we can’t always agree on everything. The art of conversation has lost their ways to the point where feelings matter, not facts. Sorry, just because you feel a certain way does not make it factual. Same as telling a lie. Say all you want about a lie, but that does not make it true. Evidence, my friend, pure evidence. (And now, with a quick wave of my hand, Gandolf disappears in the mist of light and glitter, and who knows where he will comment next)
get over yourself
Actually, his views represented many of us. Watch/read what he said when he spoke, rather than being duped by MSM trying to convince people otherwise to fit their narrative.
Thank you, Rachel Thomas, for taking that moment to acknowledge a life lost because of the hatred and intolerance of those who are incapable and unwilling to recognize their own hypocrisy. (I’ll bet you were also angry that Jimmy Kimmel was suspended, eh?)
RIP Charlie Kirk.
So while you fools represent only 30% of the population you think you represent the majority why is the truth so hard for you to understand?
Another FOX News viewer telling us the MSM is spreading false news. The irony is just so thick but your little mind can’t see the forest for the trees.
Kirk berated black women, gay people as well as many other groups. Where in your Christo-fascist fantasy book does it say this is the right thing to do?
Michelle Browne has missed the point entirely regarding the minute our MP Rachael Thomas spoke in Parliament.
Thank you MP Thomas.
It is said that thousands more will or already have risen up to continue Turning Point USA ! It is already spreading worldwide and even here in Lethbridge as a chapter is being formed. It will certainly succeed based on the 3,500+ that participated in the Charlie Kirk vigil in Galt Gardens last Saturday. (The Turning Point USA program had over a billion viewers this week)
Where is this chapter and how can one get involved?
“Turning Point USA” – Ms Thomas will surely be a devout follower. Most if not all of her rhetoric is from the TP playbook.
Good points Michelle Browne.
The MP in question is a political animal, she does whatever political animals do. She knows her base is the right winger who are fervent about their “Christian Nationalism” and likely to vote for separation, .
For the Lethbridge Herald to allow this Letter to the Editor to be published is completely unacceptable.
“He advocated for hatred and violent protest on many occasions”
Where is the evidence of this? Your accusations and the wording of your comments can lead to civil suits!
Al Beeber would never allow this to be published.
When you have to lie to make a point, it provesjust how illegimate your concerns are! The person full of hate appears to be you, the writer!
And you are a candidate for Public School Trustee? We don’t need your radical ideas destroying the young minds in our schools!
Free speech.
One point of interest, Al Beeber is indeed still at the Lethbridge Herald and most likely was the person who published this letter.