Widdowson’s cancellation a cause of frustration
By Lethbridge Herald on February 13, 2026.
Editor,
The University of Lethbridge’s decision to cancel the speaking engagement of Frances Widdowson is both frustrating and deeply concerning. Ms. Widdowson was prepared to deliver what many believed would be a critically needed discussion on the effects of “wokeism,” as well as raise questions surrounding the reported graves at the Kamloops residential school.
Although she later returned to campus and the University chose to protect her — which was absolutely the right decision — the better course of action would have been to allow the original speaking engagement to proceed. It is extremely troubling to see free speech halted simply because not everyone agrees with what is being said. Universities, above all institutions, should be places where ideas can be expressed, examined, and debated without fear of cancellation.
Whether one agrees with a speaker is not the point. The foundation of academic freedom rests on the principle that individuals should be allowed to speak, and others should be free to decide whether to listen. Preventing discussion only deepens division and undermines trust in institutions that are meant to foster open inquiry.
There is also growing public concern regarding the allocation of hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars in response to claims about graves at the Kamloops residential school. Many Canadians believe these funds would have been better directed toward meaningful counseling access and concrete, long-term programs for those affected by residential schools.
Reports that significant funding was provided to investigate the burial sites, yet the areas remain restricted and protected, have contributed to public skepticism. Transparency and open dialogue are essential for accountability and for maintaining public confidence. When questions cannot be asked without backlash, frustration inevitably grows.
Reconciliation should be grounded in truth, openness, and responsible stewardship of public funds. Allowing respectful discussion — even when it is uncomfortable — is not harmful; rather, it is necessary for a healthy and democratic society.
I urge the University of Lethbridge and other public institutions to reaffirm their commitment to free expression and intellectual debate. Silencing speakers does not resolve disagreement; it only suppresses the conversations that universities are uniquely positioned to host.
Jill Skriver,
Lethbridge
11-10
pffffft! Sure, while we’re at it let’s get Alex Jones, David Duke, David Irvine among others and will have a big old conspiracy free for all. Find something constructive to do, Jill.
Sometimes people( university students) are afraid to hear the truth, or perhaps reluctant to admit they have been fooled by media and government.The labeling of those with opposing views shows how strong their position isn’t. To call someone racist ,or denier and shout them down is a very poor arguement . That seems to be the only real defence they have.
Two things. Free expression is not a hecklers veto. And
there is no reconciliation in life without truth.