Neglecting people with severe drug addiction isn’t an acceptable or preferable option for society
By Lethbridge Herald on July 30, 2022.
Editor:
Re: “Society is not helping drug addicts by pampering them,” Readers’ Forum, July 27.
Neglecting people dealing with debilitating drug addiction should never be an acceptable or preferable political option. But the callous politics typically involved with addiction funding/services likely reflect conservative electorate opposition, however irrational, towards making proper treatment, which may include ‘harm reduction’ methodology, available to low- and no-income addicts.
Often societally overlooked is that intense addiction usually does not originate from a bout of boredom, where a person repeatedly consumed recreationally but became heavily hooked — and homeless, soon after — on an unregulated often-deadly chemical that eventually destroyed their life and even those of loved-ones.
Tragically, it’s as though some people, however precious their souls, can be considered disposable.
Even to an otherwise democratic and relatively civilized nation, their worth(lessness) is measured basically by their sober ‘productivity’ or lack thereof.
Those people may then begin perceiving themselves as worthless and accordingly live their daily lives more haphazardly.
Sadly, many of the chronically addicted don’t really care if they overdose and never wake up.
It’s not that they necessarily want to die; it’s that they want their pointless corporeal hell to cease and desist. And I don’t think I’m just splitting hairs with that point.
Though I have not been personally affected by the opioid addiction/overdose crisis in my country, I have suffered enough unrelenting ACE-related hyper-anxiety to have known, enjoyed and appreciated the great release upon consuming alcohol and/or THC. Yet, I once was one of those who, while sympathetic, would look down on those who’d ‘allowed’ themselves to become addicted to alcohol and/or illicit hard drugs.
However, upon learning that serious life trauma, notably adverse childhood experiences, is very often behind the addict’s debilitating addiction, I began to understand ball-and-chain self-medicating: The greater the drug-induced euphoria/escape one attains from its use, the more one wants to repeat the experience; and the more intolerable one finds their sober reality, the more pleasurable that escape should be perceived.
By extension, the greater one’s mental pain or trauma while sober, the greater the need for escape from reality, thus the more addictive the euphoric escape-form will likely be.
The lasting mental pain resulting from trauma is very formidable yet invisibly confined to inside one’s head. It is solitarily suffered, unlike an openly visible physical disability or condition, which tends to elicit sympathy/empathy from others.
It can make every day a mental ordeal, unless the turmoil is prescription and/or illicitly medicated.
The preconceived erroneous notion addicts are simply weak-willed and/or have committed a moral crime is, fortunately, gradually diminishing.
Also, we now know that Western pharmaceutical corporations intentionally pushed their very addictive and profitable opiates — I call it the real moral crime — for which they got off relatively lightly, considering the resulting immense suffering and overdose death numbers.
Frank Sterle Jr.
White Rock, B.C.
19-18
Every person makes choices. Druggies make a choice to not seek help. Let them go. Quit throwing taxpayer money at them.
Yep, the root cause mantra. What’s a guy in White Rock, B.C. Having a daily stroll on Marine Drive and marvelling in the vista of Semiahmoo Bay and Mount Baker, lecturing little old Lethbridge about the trials and tribulations of life. Ah, 760 miles away, in the safe zone.
White Rock BC Says: Tragically, it’s as though some people, however precious their souls, can be considered disposable.
What I am wondering at this point is whether you are referring to the addicted, or the community they destroy, businesses they destroy or the devastating loss of society because those that treat them do not consider those poor souls?
At what point does one consider that “non taxpaying non profits”, (who pay their executives more than most businesses in a community), must allow them to treat non tax paying addicted in a downtown that is the heart of the revenue stream that funds the same group?
If you DO NO HARM TO ANYONE you have my support!