November 21st, 2024

We need to talk about who owns unceded land in B.C.


By Letter to the Editor on February 26, 2020.

The Wet’suwet’en dispute over the Coastal Gaslink pipeline has generated increasing amounts of heat, but little light. I thought a review of history might help.

In 1763, the British king, George III, issued a royal proclamation requiring all colonies to negotiate land cessions with Indigenous peoples, rather than simply seizing land as they had been doing. Nova Scotia and Lower Canada ignored the proclamation. Upper Canada, though, began treaty-making, resulting in the first land cession treaty, the Treaty of Niagara, in 1764. Many others followed in Ontario.

When B.C. joined Confederation in 1871, John A. Macdonald tried to convince the colony to negotiate treaties. B.C. refused, continuing its long no-treaty policy, and Macdonald, anxious to have them join, let it slide. With a couple of exceptions, it has remained unresolved ever since. Most of B.C. remains unceded territory.

In 1867, Canada assumed the role of the Crown in taking over Indian Affairs. The new dominion promised to continue the previous rights granted to Indigenous peoples, including the 1763 Declaration. To demonstrate their willingness to do this, the Macdonald government set about negotiating land cession treaties in western Ontario and on the Prairies beginning with Treaty 1 in western Ontario in 1871. Ours is Treaty 7 (1877).

In recent years, the B.C. and Canadian governments have jointly attempted to negotiate agreements with the Indigenous nations in B.C., but with little success. The reason is that B.C. refuses to give up any land and the federal government refuses to negotiate unless the First Nations agree up front they will surrender the land. Since the UN Declaration on the Rights of indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) clearly states they cannot be required to surrender their land, this has been a non-starter.

Assuming the Declaration of 1763 still applies, and I see no reason to think otherwise, who owns the unceded land in B.C.? I think the answer is clear and the Wet’suwet’en cause is just. Both law and morality seem to be on their side.

The governments of B.C. and Canada have been negligent for generations. It is finally coming home to roost. The Indigenous peoples of B.C. whose territories remain unceded, have, in the past, indicated their willingness to negotiate agreements to share the land and resources. What they have in mind remains to be seen, but we certainly need to talk. The sooner we get on with it, the better for Canada.

Dave Sheppard

Lethbridge

Share this story:

11
-10
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Southern Albertan

I wonder if this is really true. This seems tio indicate that the Trudeau Liberal government is considering a $ multi-million dollar loan to Coastal Gaslink with our tax dollars via Export Development Canada….despite their talk of reconciliation? If this is true, I am incredulous.
“Sign now: Block Trudeau’s multi-million dollar loan to Coastal Gaslink”
http://www.act.leadnow.ca/edc-loan-cgl/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=blast2020-02-25

Southern Albertan

Oops, that website doesn’t ‘work.’ This:
https://leadnow.ca/edc-loan-cgl
This doesn’t work either, so folks will have to research this another way.

ChuckB

I was raised by my Step-Dad, the greatest man I have ever known. He was a native from the Edson area and used to tell me “I was born here, you were born here, so why should I have more rights than you?” He had no respect for anyone not willing to work and taught me my work ethic. I miss him every day. His philosophy was we are all equal and should treat each other with respect. He would have had no respect for those disrupting rail and automobile traffic.

Southern Albertan

Yes, and if successive Liberal and Conservative governments over more than 100 years had handled the issue with unceded territory and hereditary chiefs the way they should have, we would not be seeing all of ‘the troubles’ now.

biff

time to repeal the indian act (1876, for god sake! the bigotry, racism, one sided power advantage and colonialism inherent makes the act an abomination. we can begin with taking issue with the imposition of band councils – which is modeled after our corrupt political processes). moreover, we can assure peace by running the pipelines through communities that want them…like resolute’s, zulu’s, orich’s, citi zen’s, ewing’s, cameron’s, and j57’s properties (so long as they do not live near me).

trackback

buy viagra

WALCOME