City council catering to a small group with fencing decision

I have read the comments so its my turn again. You will note people like Chris (YQLdude) who profits from the Addict misery stands firmly in his position on his way to sainthood. If I stand firmly on mine I am the devil incarnate.
As we progress through this process, you will note that people like Chris will try to minimize each step along the way. So Gangs/Guns is now nothing more than a progressional state that raises the Safety for the Addicts. Prior to this I believe the Police stated that “almost everyone carries a knife” which was the previous stage of acceptance.
So when “Two Beavers” shoots “Charlie” in the head it will be marketed by the same group as “Two Beavers has a right to safety”. However if “Charlie” shoots “Two Beavers” in the head then “Charlie was a racist and “Two Beavers Cracked”.
This is the next stage of normalizing the violence “Its just Addicts trying to survive” because they have a disease and that takes precedence over everyone’s safety including yours.
Most of us sit quitely in our homes and get a good nights sleep wake up and look around and say, its not as bad as Bremner says. He exaggerates, he is attempting to “stir the pot”
This is very much like doing a complicated job, if it is overwhelmly complicated you break the job down into Tasks that lead to a specific Milestone. The total of all completed Milestones sees the completed job.
With Addiction and a complicit city you can do the same thing. You itemize all the things that if a city was complicit and complacent, would lead to a milestone of semi destruction. Then you sit back and watch as Lethbridge just allows it to happen. Small things at first start to occur. Finally building up to the crescendo which is a lawless downtown and bleeding hearts like Chris, MSTH, LOPS, etc etc defending every inch of the way.
The nonprofits thrive on Chaos. The more that occurs, the more the City Managers and Council have to rely on them. There is a point where the Chaos becomes a level of delirium that results in common sense going out the window.
Here is one example “Homeless” is defined as anyone without a home, ANYONE! So that includes Addicts. At SACPA the pronouncement…. ” All the homeless should be homed”. When I typed that I am sure I heard Angels in the background singing? Trumpets blared as I got the “ALL” in that statement. The eyerollers in SACPA all smiled, clapped from the wrist down as most Royals do, and some developed a tear in the corner of the eye.
The Chart indicating on average 70% of the Addicts die in a Single Resident Occupancy was not even considered a valid point. The Chart, which was AHS data, was not given any credibility because it interferes with “Rent and Gov Subsidies”. When produced, the wave of the eyeroll almost knocked me off my chair.
So Evidence and Proofs are only valid if it supports the eyerolling wrist clappers position.
So you know how unwittingly complacency works this is what escaped you thus far;
1) The suddenly and rather amazingly quick and free flow of all drugs in this city
2) The numbers of addicts doubling every 2.5-3 years
3) The poorly published figures which you never question which is how many stay sober after spending the money of developing this amazing amount of failed infrastructure that kills your downtown. This is where you get the “if one life is saved its enough” I am here to say, ah-h-h no its not! Because citizens will die while the nonprofits who profit “save that one life” but you don’t count!
4) Rights- as time progresses, Addicts have a right to defecate anywhere they want because you won’t provide them the Spearman Special ($200,000 washroom) that they destroy because that is also their right. Its okay for an addict to act out, because he/she is just venting. If you do, you are a racist uncaring pig.
5) Property- Whats yours is theirs, whats theirs is taken from you and they need it more than you do.
6) Security- If you do not lock up everything you own, then its your fault it was stolen. So the problem is not the Addict stealing your stuff, it is you whom is negligent and should know better.
7) Not sure why this is an issue “Everyone knows they all carry a knife”? Notice how what is abnormal somehow becomes the standard? Do you carry a knife? Perhaps one should ask the Police Chief, should we be carrying a knife?
8) Guns and Gangs- Well so much for carrying a knife because you never bring a knife to a gun fight. So now what?

The point of all 8 points above is the normalization is now setting in. Soon you almost expect to hear someone say, well of course she carries a gun, she has to protect herself!! And, suddenly you feel like a fool asking the question.

So as YQLDude normalizes every stage as this progresses so does the other 39 and of course the School of Higher Learning. The eyerollers, well, they are just their to fawn over everything holy, righteous, or profitable.