March 6th, 2026
Chamber of Commerce

Widdowson’s cancellation a cause of frustration


By Lethbridge Herald on February 13, 2026.

Editor, 

The University of Lethbridge’s decision to cancel the speaking engagement of Frances Widdowson is both frustrating and deeply concerning. Ms. Widdowson was prepared to deliver what many believed would be a critically needed discussion on the effects of “wokeism,” as well as raise questions surrounding the reported graves at the Kamloops residential school.

Although she later returned to campus and the University chose to protect her — which was absolutely the right decision — the better course of action would have been to allow the original speaking engagement to proceed. It is extremely troubling to see free speech halted simply because not everyone agrees with what is being said. Universities, above all institutions, should be places where ideas can be expressed, examined, and debated without fear of cancellation.

Whether one agrees with a speaker is not the point. The foundation of academic freedom rests on the principle that individuals should be allowed to speak, and others should be free to decide whether to listen. Preventing discussion only deepens division and undermines trust in institutions that are meant to foster open inquiry.

There is also growing public concern regarding the allocation of hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars in response to claims about graves at the Kamloops residential school. Many Canadians believe these funds would have been better directed toward meaningful counseling access and concrete, long-term programs for those affected by residential schools.

Reports that significant funding was provided to investigate the burial sites, yet the areas remain restricted and protected, have contributed to public skepticism. Transparency and open dialogue are essential for accountability and for maintaining public confidence. When questions cannot be asked without backlash, frustration inevitably grows.

Reconciliation should be grounded in truth, openness, and responsible stewardship of public funds. Allowing respectful discussion — even when it is uncomfortable — is not harmful; rather, it is necessary for a healthy and democratic society.

I urge the University of Lethbridge and other public institutions to reaffirm their commitment to free expression and intellectual debate. Silencing speakers does not resolve disagreement; it only suppresses the conversations that universities are uniquely positioned to host.

Jill Skriver, 

Lethbridge 

Share this story:

11
-10
Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
lumpy

pffffft! Sure, while we’re at it let’s get Alex Jones, David Duke, David Irvine among others and will have a big old conspiracy free for all. Find something constructive to do, Jill.

old school

Sometimes people( university students) are afraid to hear the truth, or perhaps reluctant to admit they have been fooled by media and government.The labeling of those with opposing views shows how strong their position isn’t. To call someone racist ,or denier and shout them down is a very poor arguement . That seems to be the only real defence they have.

buckwheat

Two things. Free expression is not a hecklers veto. And
there is no reconciliation in life without truth.

buckwheat

See all the “I’ll believe anything crowd” has checked in.

IMO

In view of Ms. Skriver’s admonition regarding the necessity for reconciliation to be grounded in truth and openness, perhaps she, and others, might benefit from a close reading of, The Fourth World: An Indian Reality, by George Manuel and Michael Posluns followed up by a thoughtful and open minded reading of The Reconciliation Manifesto: Recovering the Land, Rebuilding the Economy, by Arthur Manuel.

buckwheat

1974 for the first one, 2017 for the second one. Time to move on to the fact that you have to have truth before reconciliation. If it is the reverse there is no end to the complaints and issues past gone. I think a fair number of Canadians, possibly a majority, want to see excavation in Kamloops, and if it is determined that there are remains, test for DNA, create a data bank, canvas indigenous members who could come forward and lay claim to those remains, identify through DNA testing, and return the remains to the family for a proper burial. None of this has been done, hence there is no facts to truth, therefore no reconciliation and more leaning towards this conclusion.

lumpy

Yeah, you can call indigenous people liars… looks good on you, buck

buckwheat

Posting this her for your enjoyment and entertainment. I have 911 on standby. Let me know where you’re at and I will send the local fire department to put your hair out.
https://youtu.be/TSRn8BzpvLc?si=PHAy_zgB4IWmyMOe



16
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x