Canada must break free from U.S. trade dependence
By Lethbridge Herald on February 11, 2025.
Rashid Husain Syed – TROY MEDIA
It is cold and gloomy, and the country is on edge. Tariffs are coming – period.
Yet there is a positive side to the ongoing debate about Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on Canadian exports. Could it be a blessing in disguise? Yes, if the right steps are taken at this critical juncture.
For now, let’s be fair. Canada is too dependent on the U.S. It is the largest and, in some cases, the only market for Canadian products. This reliance gives the U.S. a significant advantage. The businessperson in President Donald Trump knows this well. He is using it as leverage to twist arms and humiliate.
The U.S. and Canadian economies have been intertwined for decades. If Trump goes ahead with his tariff threat, it would end more than three decades of free trade between the two countries. Neither country can truly afford that. Tariffs would be disastrous for the Canadian economy. Millions could lose jobs. While the U.S. would also feel the impact, it would not be as severe as Canada’s.
Canada depends on the U.S. to sell products such as oil, gas, and electricity. This reliance has led Canada to sell some products at a significant discount. For example, Western Canadian Select (WCS) oil is sold to the U.S. at a discount compared to the U.S. crude benchmark, West Texas Intermediate (WTI).
With tariffs looming, Canadian heavy crude prices for March weakened further. According to media reports, the discount to the U.S. benchmark widened to about US$14.50 a barrel from about US$13.60 on Friday.
However, Canada’s vulnerability is not just a result of Trump’s actions. Past domestic decisions have also played a role in narrowing our options. Actions by the Trudeau government, such as rejecting Germany’s request for Canadian natural gas exports during its energy crisis – and the broader reluctance to expand export infrastructure – have left Canada even more exposed to Trump’s tariffs. Instead of positioning itself as a reliable energy supplier to the world, Canada has remained overly dependent on the U.S., leaving its economy vulnerable to protectionist policies.
As Canada prepares to counter Trump’s threats, the focus has turned to retaliatory tariffs. Federal and provincial governments are working to present a united front. However, diverging priorities among provinces make achieving unity a difficult task. Alberta, for instance, has strongly indicated it will not accept any export tariffs, especially on oil and gas going to the U.S.
“Alberta is the most exposed province to tariff disruptions by a wide margin,” University of Calgary economics professor Trevor Tombe told reporters. As Canada’s largest oil-producing province, Alberta accounted for 84 per cent of the country’s crude output in 2023.
“The bedrock of that tariff-free relationship between Canada and the U.S. is energy,” Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said last week. She emphasized that Canada exports heavily discounted oil to the U.S., which is then upgraded and sold as a value-added product for a price up to three times higher than the raw crude.
This is a win-win situation for both sides, she said.
While Alberta emphasizes the critical role of energy in maintaining trade stability, others, like former prime minister Stephen Harper, have pointed out deeper flaws in Canada’s trade relationship with the U.S. Harper rebutted Trump’s claim that Canada’s trade surplus with the U.S. represents a subsidy by the U.S. to Canada. He argued the surplus exists because of large quantities of Canadian oil purchased by the U.S. at a significant discount, driven by Canada’s lack of alternative export options. “It’s actually Canada that subsidizes the United States in this regard,” Harper said.
While Trump appears intent on imposing tariffs on Canadian imports, Ottawa is exploring other export opportunities. Canada is enhancing trade ties with partners like Japan, the European Union, and other global markets. This represents a silver lining – an opportunity for Canada to diversify its customer base and reduce reliance on the U.S.
This diversification will require political adjustments and significant infrastructure investments. For example, Canada must focus on constructing new export infrastructure, including liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals, to supply energy to high-demand markets in Europe and Asia. At the same time, trade agreements with key partners must be strengthened to open access to a broader range of products and services.
The Trump threat could then be a God-given opportunity for a resource-rich Canada. Ottawa seems to recognize this.
“I have always had the mandate as Canada’s trade minister to diversify,” Mary Ng, Canada’s minister of international trade, told CNBC on Jan. 16. “It’s really great for us to be doing work with America, but, absolutely, we also need to be pursuing opportunities around the world. And we are.”
This will require political adjustments and proper infrastructure. But if Canada succeeds, it will no longer need to offer discounts on its oil and gas exports, which would greatly benefit the Canadian economy, especially Alberta.
The process will be long and arduous, but the rewards will be worth it.
“Canada must also wake up to the reality that we need to diversify our global customer base, not just for energy but for all Canadian products, to build a more prosperous and resilient economy,” Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers CEO Lisa Baiton said.
She could not be more correct.
Toronto-based Rashid Husain Syed is a highly regarded analyst specializing in energy and politics, particularly in the Middle East. Rashid frequently lends his expertise as a speaker at global conferences. Organizations such as the Department of Energy in Washington and the International Energy Agency in Paris have sought his insights on global energy matters.
The views, opinions and positions expressed by all Troy Media columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Troy Media.
24-23
Not mentioned, and the elephant in the room, is our global obliligation to transition away from fossil fuels. Diversification of our energy supply is important – not doubling down on the same old thing with more infrastructure.
Ok Mark.
thanks
the real history of canada is that we sucked the teat of britain until the the early parts of the 1900s, and then we curled up in comfort a woolly american flag thereafter…and moreover, we curled up in bed with yet another massive human rights abuser besides the usa, china, giving up ever more security and independence. we do not produce our own cars…we gave that up over a 100 years ago, unlike most other larger economy nations that produce home made cars, to produce usa cars; we hardly even produced our own canned soups etc., defaulting to usa made bland products, including cereals, boxed, tinned and frozen ready for the oven junk; we gave over to the usa massive cutting edge tech like our aerospace industry…our pathetic “leaders” each of govt and business took the easiest way forward, and no doubt a good handout from the big corps that benefited from our culture of being led by followers.
oh, canada, still the raw material colony and subsidiary of the usa machine. while we still have a higher social standard, more of a caring one for the other, we are about as independent as those that ever live in their parent’s basement, maybe a little less so.
As a decendent of the family of the last Canadian-owned automobile company, I’ll attest to your assessment, biff. Profit over people; surplus over sovereignty.
It’s a bad time to be led by America-loving autocrats.